arthropathy: A systematic review Clinical outcomes of proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis for post-traumatic wrist

We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes after proximal row carpectomy or to four-corner arthrodesis for scaphoid non-union advanced collapse or scapholunate advanced collapse arthritis. Seven studies (Levels I–III; 240 patients, 242 wrists) were evaluated. Significantly different postoperative values were as follows for four-corner arthrodesis versus proximal row carpectomy groups: wrist extension, 39 (SD 11o) versus 43 (SD 11o); wrist flexion, 32 (SD 10o) versus 36 (SD 11o); flexion-extension arc, 62 (SD 14o) versus 75 (SD 10o); radial deviation, 14 (SD 5o) versus 10 (SD 5o); hand grip strength as a percentage of contralateral side, 74% (SD 13) versus 67% (SD 16); overall complication rate, 29% versus 14%. The most common post-operative complications were non-union (grouped incidence, 7%) after four-corner arthrodesis and synovitis and clinically significant oedema (3.1%) after proximal row carpectomy. Radial deviation and post-operative hand grip strength (as a percentage of the contralateral side) were significantly better after four-corner arthrodesis. Four-corner arthrodesis gave significantly greater post-operative radial deviation and grip strength as a percentage of the opposite side. Wrist flexion, extension, and the flexion-extension arc were better after proximal row carpectomy, which also had a lower overall complication rate. Level of evidence: Level III (Level I-III studies), Systematic Review. Therapeutic.